<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Creative Digressions &#187; Google</title>
	<atom:link href="http://creativedigressions.com/tag/google/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://creativedigressions.com</link>
	<description>Online Marketing, Social Media, and the Web 2.0</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 19:50:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Yahoo!: &#8220;We Don&#8217;t Value Meta Keywords Either&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://creativedigressions.com/2009/10/yahoo-we-dont-value-meta-keywords-either/</link>
		<comments>http://creativedigressions.com/2009/10/yahoo-we-dont-value-meta-keywords-either/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 21:19:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Harry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Buzz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[keywords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[meta data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[meta keywords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo!]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://creativedigressions.com/?p=27</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Earlier this week, Yahoo!&#8217;s Senior Director of Search Cris Pierry announced at SMX East, a search marketing conference in New York, that Yahoo! does not value the keywords attribute of the meta tag in its search algorithm. Not even a little bit. This announcement comes just two weeks after Google made a similar announcement in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Earlier this week, Yahoo!&#8217;s Senior Director of Search Cris Pierry announced at SMX East, a search marketing conference in New York, that Yahoo! does not value the keywords attribute of the meta tag in its search algorithm. Not even a little bit. This announcement comes just two weeks after Google made a <a href="http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/09/google-does-not-use-keywords-meta-tag.html">similar announcement in their blog</a>.</p>
<p>Spokespeople for both engines have long hinted that meta keywords do not play a large role in formulating their search results. This was a gradual response to the widespread issue of spam in the keywords attribute, and the ability of many to utilize meta keywords to gain undeserved or just plain incorrect rankings.</p>
<p>I wrote a more detailed analysis of this issue in the <a href=" http://gazebo.commonplaces.com/2009/10/is-this-the-end-for-the-meta-keywords-tag/">CommonPlaces blog</a>, but here&#8217;s the least you need to know:</p>
<ul>
<li>Yahoo doesn&#8217;t recognize the meta keywords tag. They won&#8217;t penalize you for having one&mdash;they&#8217;ll simply ignore it. Ditto for Google.</li>
<li>Bing, on the other hand, does recognize the tag. However, <a href="http://www.bing.com/community/blogs/webmaster/archive/2009/07/18/head-s-up-on-lt-head-gt-tag-optimization-sem-101.aspx">they admit that they place a low value on it</a>.</li>
<li>Final recommendation: If you already have meta keywords in place, leave them. If you&#8217;re building a new site, include meta keywords if it can be done with little effort. Don&#8217;t go out of your way to include a tag that will either be ignored or minimally valued</li>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://creativedigressions.com/2009/10/yahoo-we-dont-value-meta-keywords-either/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
